No. robots.txt is a voluntary standard. Reputable crawlers respect it, but it cannot technically prevent access — for that, use server-level blocking such as a firewall or user-agent filtering.
Control which search engines and AI crawlers can access your site, curate what AI agents see when they're allowed in, and publish a standard security contact file — all in one place.
Choose robots.txt, llms.txt, or security.txt.
Select bots to block, list your key pages, or add your security contact.
Copy the result and place it at the exact path shown for that file.
Access control. Tells crawlers — search engines, AI bots, and scrapers — what they may and may not fetch.
Content curation. A hand-picked index of your best pages, for the AI agents you do allow through.
Vulnerability disclosure. A standard place for a security researcher to report an issue responsibly.
No. robots.txt is a voluntary standard. Reputable crawlers respect it, but it cannot technically prevent access — for that, use server-level blocking such as a firewall or user-agent filtering.
It's an emerging convention proposed at llmstxt.org, not a formal standard ratified by a standards body. Adoption is growing, particularly among documentation platforms, but AI systems are not universally guaranteed to read it.
RFC 9116 requires it at /.well-known/security.txt. Publishing a copy at /security.txt as well (ideally redirecting to the .well-known location) is common for backward compatibility with older tools.
No. All three generators run entirely in your browser using JavaScript. Nothing you enter is sent to our servers.